Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

Petroleum Geoscience

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Flodin, E. A. Articles by Aydin, A. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Upscaled models of flow and transport in faulted sandstone: boundary condition effects and explicit fracture modelling

¹ Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2115, USA
² Present address: ChevronTexaco Energy Technology Company, PO Box 6019, San Ramon, CA 94583-0719, USA (e-mail: eflodin@chevrontexaco.com)
³ Department of Petroleum Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2220, USA
⁴ ChevronTexaco Energy Technology Company, PO Box 6019, San Ramon, CA 94583-0719, USA

Faults formed by shearing of joint zones in sandstone contain fine-scale features that cannot be represented explicitly in large-scale flow simulations. Upscaled models are, therefore, required for reservoir engineering computations. These models attempt to capture fine-scale effects through equivalent permeabilities that are computed from the underlying fine-scale characterization. In this paper the impact of several different local boundary conditions on the calculated equivalent permeability is assessed. Pressure–no-flow, periodic and mirror-periodic boundary specifications are considered. The resulting coarse-scale permeability tensors are shown to be highly dependent on the local boundary conditions used in the models. In cases with through-going high-permeability features, pressure–no-flow and mirror-periodic boundary conditions provide upscaled permeabilities that correctly capture global flow characteristics. Periodic boundary conditions, by contrast, are more suitable for systems lacking through-going high-permeability features. This sensitivity to boundary conditions calls into question the robustness of the equivalent permeability for the general case and suggests that dominant through-going features would best be modelled explicitly. In addition, due to the very small thickness and high permeability of some through-going structural features (e.g. slip surfaces), globally upscaled models are inadequate for the modelling of transport. To address these issues, a ‘partial upscaling’ method – removing the through-going high-permeability features from the fine model, upscaling to a coarse grid and then reintroducing the high-permeability features back into the coarsened model – is adopted. This procedure is shown to provide coarse models that give accurate predictions for both flow and transport.

KEYWORDS: faults, fractures, permeability, upscaling, boundary conditions

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. S. Berg and E. Oian Hierarchical approach for simulating fluid flow in normal fault zones Petroleum Geoscience, February 1, 2007; 13(1): 25 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]