Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

Petroleum Geoscience

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ritter, U. Articles by Sættem, J. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Heat flow in the Vøring Basin, Mid-Norwegian Shelf

¹ SINTEF Petroleum Research, NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway (e-mail: ulrich.ritter@iku.sintef.no)
² Omegalink International Ltd, 2382 Route 118, Dorchester, NH 03266, USA
³ Present address: Miljø- og ubyggingsetaten, Sauherad kommune, NO-3812 Akkerhaugen, Norway

In situ temperature and heat flow were determined in 1994 at 159 sites, grouped into 66 clusters between latitude 65° N and 67°30’ N at water depths from 669 m to 1464 m. The mean of all cluster heat-flow measurements conducted in this survey was 58.5 mW m^–2, with a standard error of ±4.40 mW m^–2. The mean heat flow from IKU well data for the Trøndelag Platform is 56.2±6.65 mW m^–2. Shorter wavelength heat-flow variations appear to be controlled structurally and can be explained by sedimentation and thermal refraction effects. High heat flow associated with faulted structural highs such as the Nyk High and Vema Dome–Rym Fault Zone may also result from hydrothermal convection. Relatively isolated high (106.6 mW m^–2) heat flow observed at 846 m water depth may be an artefact of bottom water disturbances; however, virtually identical deep-water heat-flow anomalies, believed to be of hydrothermal origin, also exist. While heat-flow measurements made at water depths less than 1000 m should be regarded with caution, there is presently no justification for eliminating those exhibiting linear heat flow with depth. Submarine avalanches seem unimportant in the survey area. Neither crustal thinning, underplating nor sill intrusion, within the last 50 Ma, would have a measurable effect on present-day heat flow. The net effect of crustal thinning may be a reduction of the crustal heat generation potential, depending on the degree of thinning of the upper crust, since the accumulating sediments cannot compensate fully for the lost heat generation from a crystalline basement.

KEYWORDS: heat-flow measurements, Vøring Basin, Norwegian shelf, thermal history

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Scheck-Wenderoth and Y. Maystrenko How warm are passive continental margins? A 3-D lithosphere-scale study from the Norwegian margin Geology, May 1, 2008; 36(5): 419 - 422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]