Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Petroleum Geoscience   Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Petroleum Geoscience; January 2005; v. 11; no. 1; p. 57-65; DOI: 10.1144/1354-079303-612
© 2005 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rivenæs, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Sjøholm, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Original Article

A 3D stochastic model integrating depth, fault and property uncertainty for planning robust wells, Njord Field, offshore Norway

Jan C. Rivenæs, Cecilie Otterlei, Eli Zachariassen, Chris Dart and Jorunn Sjøholm

Norsk Hydro ASA, PO Box 7190, 5020 Bergen, Norway

The Njord Field, situated in the Haltenbanken area, is one of the most challenging reservoirs on the Norwegian shelf. The structural complexity is high, with numerous intersecting faults compartmentalizing the reservoir. The reservoir is dominated by alternating shale and sand intervals of tidal, estuarine and deltaic depositional origin.

One of the main segments on Njord – the Central Area – was the target for a one-year improved oil recovery study. The Central Area reservoir is produced by depletion, with a current recovery factor of only 6%, as most faults appear to seal during production. The previous drilling experience revealed quite large uncertainty with respect to both depth and missing faults due to poor seismic data quality.

In order to plan further wells in this area a model that comprises the full uncertainty with respect to both structural components (depth uncertainty and faults) and property components (facies, permeability, porosity) was made. The model was built by combining commercial modelling software (IRAP RMS and STORM:HORIZON) with an R&D tool (HAVANA) in a manner that has not been attempted previously, and 200 stochastic realizations were run. Each realization has a different structural 3D grid (depth and fault pattern) and different petrophysical properties. A streamline simulator in IRAP RMS was applied to rank the realizations and ten realizations were chosen for further well screening in the flow simulator (ECLIPSE). The model was applied to propose two new well targets that were robust economically (given all uncertainty). In addition, the model was applied in testing various unconventional well types, for example so-called ‘connector-wells’, which are open holes in the reservoir (but not connected to the surface), in order to connect fault blocks bounded by sealing faults.

Drilling and subsequent seismic interpretation after the model had been built revealed that the structural uncertainty was even greater than predicted. It is crucial to capture the full interpretation uncertainty and, in particular, to address the problem of jump-correlation across fault blocks. Despite this, however, the observed cumulative production from the new oil producer compares well with the prognosis from the model.

KEYWORDS: Njord, structural uncertainty, stochastic faulting, well screening, reservoir modelling




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Petroleum GeoscienceHome page
A. W. Martinius, P. S. Ringrose, C. Brostrom, C. Elfenbein, A. Naess, and J. E. Ringas
Reservoir challenges of heterolithic tidal sandstone reservoirs in the Halten Terrace, mid-Norway
Petroleum Geoscience, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 3 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London