Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Petroleum Geoscience   Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Petroleum Geoscience; May 2005; v. 11; no. 2; p. 125-129; DOI: 10.1144/1354-079304-609
© 2005 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teige, G. M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Nordgård Bolås, H. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Original Article

Capillary resistance and trapping of hydrocarbons: a laboratory experiment

Gunn M. G. Teige1, Christian Hermanrud1, Wibeke Hammervold Thomas2, Ove Bjørn Wilson3 and Hege M. Nordgård Bolås1

1 Statoil ASA, Arkitekt Ebbellsvei 10, Rotvoll, N-7005 Trondheim, Norway (e-mail: gmgt@statoil.com)
2 Statoil ASA, N-4035 Stavanger, Norway
3 Reslab, N-4033 Forus, Norway

Low permeability cap rocks retain oil by capillary forces when the pore throats of the seals are sufficiently small to prevent a flux of oil into the cap rock. In order to investigate the influence of aquifer overpressures on oil retention, water pressure was applied to a water-wet, highly permeable (1988 mD) core sample, which was oil-saturated to irreducible water saturation Swi and mounted with a low-permeability and water-wet membrane at the outlet. A water pressure difference of 0.5 MPa was applied across the core. This pressure was high enough to ensure fluid flow through the sample. The experiment was designed to see whether the water pressure would force oil through the membrane or if capillary forces at the sandstone–membrane interface would retain the oil, in which case water flow might take place in the (residual) water in the core and through the membrane.

The experiment showed that oil was kept in place by capillary forces while water flowed through the core and the membrane. Accordingly, residual water can move through sandstones that are saturated to Swi. The experiments also demonstrated that the permeability associated with this residual water is high enough to prevent overpressures in the aquifer below the oil–water contact from pushing oil through a membrane seal. Thus, even for this highly permeable sandstone, the overpressure in the aquifer will not cause capillary seal failure.

KEYWORDS: membrane sealing, water permeability, ‘irreducible’ water flow, capillary seal failure, overpressure, capillary pressure







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London