Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Petroleum Geoscience   Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Petroleum Geoscience; May 2005; v. 11; no. 2; p. 147-156; DOI: 10.1144/1354-079304-639
© 2005 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spitzer, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Original Article

Advances in seismic imaging through basalts: a case study from the Faroe–Shetland Basin

Roman Spitzer1, Robert S. White1 and iSIMM Team2

1 Bullard Laboratories, Cambridge University, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0EZ, UK(e-mail: rwhite@esc.cam.ac. uk)
2 See acknowledgements for list

New seismic reflection data have been used to image intra- and sub-basalt features beneath the Faroe–Shetland Basin in the North Atlantic, where the highly reflective top and base boundaries of flood basalts and their complex internal structure make successful seismic imaging difficult. This study demonstrates that appropriate acquisition and processing of marine seismic data from hydrophone streamers and ocean-bottom seismometers (OBS) has the potential to enhance significantly imaging of intra-basalt and sub-basalt seismic reflections. The intersection of a new seismic reflection profile recorded in 2002 with a seismic profile recorded in 1998 allows a direct comparison of advances in sub-basalt imaging over this period and an interpretation of geological structures and seismic velocities at the intersection.

To achieve better resolution of sediments below basaltic layers, surface seismic reflection data using a broad-band, low-frequency source have been recorded. By using a source wavelet with a significantly enhanced frequency spectrum centred at 10 Hz, generated from a large (167 l) airgun array tuned to the first bubble pulse, a wavelet is produced that is capable of penetrating through thick basaltic sequences. Furthermore, recording the low-frequency reflections to large offsets along a 12 000 m long streamer with 3.125 m single sensor spacing allowed effective suppression of multiple reflections, enhanced the precision of velocity analyses and produced better migration results. Seismic data along the same profile were also recorded on a dense deployment of 85 four-component OBS at 2 km or 6 km station spacing. These complementary ocean-bottom data allowed the large-scale velocity variations within and beneath the basalt to be constrained by recording at large offsets the termination of the diving rays (c. 18 km) propagating through the basalt.

Integration of seismic reflection data and OBS recordings yields good seismic velocity estimates and, therefore, increased confidence in the interpretation of intra- and sub-basalt features and lithology. Four major stratigraphic units characterized by their seismic velocities and reflection characters were identified: (a) post-basalt sediments; (b) basalt sequence; (c) sub-basalt unit; and (d) the top of presumed Cretaceous basement. The top boundary of the basalt sequence is defined by a strong reflection with a steep velocity increase from 3.5 km s–1 to 4.5 km s–1 in the c. 200 m thick layer above it. The basalt sequence here is c. 2.5 km thick. Beneath the base of the basalt there is a velocity decrease from 5.8 km s–1 to 5.2 km s–1. The sub-basalt unit is subdivided further into hyaloclastites mixed with sediments and sills, and sub-basalt sediments separated by another velocity inversion from 5.2 km s–1 to 4.5 km s–1. The Cretaceous basement with velocities above 5.5 km s–1 lies underneath these sub-basalt sediments.

KEYWORDS: Faroe–Shetland Basin, basalts, seismic imaging, ocean-bottom seismometers




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
C. Gaina, L. Gernigon, and P. Ball
Palaeocene-Recent plate boundaries in the NE Atlantic and the formation of the Jan Mayen microcontinent
Journal of the Geological Society, July 1, 2009; 166(4): 601 - 616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological MagazineHome page
D. A. JERRAM, R. T. SINGLE, R. W. HOBBS, and C. E. NELSON
Understanding the offshore flood basalt sequence using onshore volcanic facies analogues: an example from the Faroe-Shetland basin
Geological Magazine, May 1, 2009; 146(3): 353 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London