Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Petroleum Geoscience   Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Petroleum Geoscience; August 2005; v. 11; no. 3; p. 195-202; DOI: 10.1144/1354-079303-597
© 2005 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McVay, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Alvarado, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Original Article

Calibration improves uncertainty quantification in production forecasting

Duane A. McVay, W. John Lee and Martin G. Alvarado

Texas A&M University, 3116 TAMU, College Station, Texas, 77843-3116, USA (e-mail: mcvay@spindletop.tamu.edu)

Despite recent advances in uncertainty quantification, the petroleum industry continues to underestimate the uncertainties associated with reservoir production forecasts. This paper describes a calibration process that can improve quantification of uncertainties associated with reservoir performance prediction.

Existing methods underestimate uncertainty because they fail to account for all, and particularly unknown, factors affecting reservoir performance and because they do not investigate all combinations of reservoir parameter values. However, the primary limitation of existing methods is that their reliability cannot be verified because the testing of an estimate of uncertainty from existing methods yields only one sample for what is inherently a statistical result. Verification and improvement of uncertainty estimates can be achieved with calibration – comparison of actual performance with previous uncertainty estimates and then using the results to scale subsequent uncertainty estimates.

Calibration of uncertainty estimates can be achieved with a more frequent, if not continuous, process of data acquisition, model calibration, model prediction and uncertainty assessment, similar to the process employed in weather forecasting. Improved ability to quantify production forecast uncertainty should result in better investment decision making and, ultimately, increased profitability.

KEYWORDS: uncertainty, forecasting, petroleum, calibration, reservoir management







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London