Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

Petroleum Geoscience

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ohm, S. E. Articles by Foss, A. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

An atypical early mature oil in Block 35/1, Norwegian North Sea – hypersaline, carbonate Jurassic environment?

¹ Petroleum Geochemistry Program, P.O. Box 1047, University of Oslo, Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway (e-mail: sverreo@geo.uio.no)
² ConocoPhillips Norge, P.O. Box 220, N-4098 Tananger, Norway
³ Geolab Nor A/S, Hornebergveien 5, P.O. Box 5740 Fossegrenda, 7002 Trondheim, Norway
⁴ Present address: Statoil, N-4032 Stavanger, Norway

Block 35/1 with the dry Sturlason structure, is located on the northernmost part of the Marflo Ridge in the Norwegian part of the Northern North Sea. It is separated by deep faults from the Sogn Graben to the east and the Marulk Basin to the west. The 35/1-1 well proved only minor shows of gas and oil in the well.

The Sturlason structure comprises a series of upthrown fault blocks in a structurally complex area. The well-established Brent Formation carrier and reservoir sandstone has shaled out this far north and the stratigraphically deeper Lower Jurassic Statfjord Formation and Triassic Lunde Formation sandstones were, in the exploration model, suggested as both carrier beds and reservoirs. The prolific Upper Jurassic Draupne (Type II organic matter, OM) and Heather (Type II/III OM) Formation source rocks were, based on seismic data, interpreted to be absent or thin over the prospect, thus implying lateral migration for filling the structure with petroleum. Structural back-stripping suggests that part of Block 35/1 was sub-aerially exposed as an island during deposition of the Upper Jurassic source rocks. This may have impacted the quality and nature of the fringing organic material due to a more oxic environment and a greater influx of Type III organic matter.

The geochemical analyses were hampered by contamination from the use of oil-based mud (C_13–23 range hydrocarbons) while drilling. Despite this, traces of true indigenous C_4–10 and C₂₅₊ range hydrocarbon are demonstrated. These results suggest presence of an evaporative condensate and heavy oil fraction originating from a source rock related to a hypersaline carbonate depositional environment.

A buoyancy-driven fluid flow study, without taking faults into account, shows the difficulty in charging the prospect and clearly suggests the presence of sealing faults. The latter are also substantiated by a separate fault-seal analysis. Traps in flanking areas could, however, receive petroleum. Gas is also interpreted to be present in shallower sediments over the eastern flank of the Sturlason structure.

KEYWORDS: North Sea, Marflo Ridge, dry well, biomarkers, gas evaporative condensate, petroleum, oxygen isotope, facies, subaerial exposure

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. M. Roberts, R. I. Corfield, N. J. Kusznir, S. J. Matthews, E.-K. Hansen, and R. J. Hooper Mapping palaeostructure and palaeobathymetry along the Norwegian Atlantic continental margin: More and Voring basins Petroleum Geoscience, February 1, 2009; 15(1): 27 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. E. Ohm, D. A. Karlsen, K. Backer-Owe, J. H. Pedersen, and H. S. Beeley A drilling mud additive influencing the geochemical interpretations of hydrocarbon shows Petroleum Geoscience, November 1, 2007; 13(4): 369 - 376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]