Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Petroleum Geoscience   Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Petroleum Geoscience; August 2006; v. 12; no. 3; p. 235-246; DOI: 10.1144/1354-079305-675
© 2006 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wennberg, O. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ogilvie, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Original Article

Fracture intensity vs. mechanical stratigraphy in platform top carbonates: the Aquitanian of the Asmari Formation, Khaviz Anticline, Zagros, SW Iran

O. P. Wennberg1, T. Svånå1, M. Azizzadeh2, A. M. M. Aqrawi1, P. Brockbank1, K. B. Lyslo1 and S. Ogilvie1

1 Statoil ASA, N-4035 Stavanger, Norway
2 Research Institute Petroleum Industry (RIPI), Tehran, Iran

Outcrop analogue studies can significantly improve the understanding of fracture distribution and their impact on fluid flow in hydrocarbon reservoirs. In particular, the outcrops may reveal details on the relationships between mechanical stratigraphy and fracture characteristics. This has been investigated in an integrated sedimentological-structural geological study in the Aquitanian sequence of the Asmari Formation on the NE limb of the Khaviz Anticline in the Zagros foothills in SW Iran. The Aquitanian sequence was deposited in a platform top setting and is characterized by well-defined bedding planes and relatively thin layers (<4 m) with rapid changes in textures from laminated peritidal mudstones to bioclast and ooid grainstones. Fractures in the studied area dominantly strike parallel to the fold axis, have a high angle to bedding and are stratabound. In the literature it is often reported that fracture spacing or the inverse fracture intensity (FI) is controlled by the mechanical layer thickness (MLT). However, in the present study area a rather poor correlation between FI and MLT was observed. Instead, the Dunham texture appears to be more important for the FI. Mud-supported textures (mudstone and wackestone) have higher FI than grain-supported (packstone and grainstone) ones. The degree of dolomitization does not appear to have any significant effect on FI within each texture class. A strong relationship between FI and MLT is observed generally in cases where there has been one single phase of extension and when interbed contacts are weak, e.g. interbedded competent limestones and incompetent shales. However, in the present study area a rather complex deformation history exists and well-developed shales between fractured carbonate layeres are lacking. It is suggested that in such cases the MLT is of minor importance for the FI, which is controlled by the texture.

KEYWORDS: Zagros, carbonates, mechanical stratigraphy, fracture intensity, Dunham texture




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
O. P. Wennberg, M. Azizzadeh, A. A. M. Aqrawi, E. Blanc, P. Brockbank, K. B. Lyslo, N. Pickard, L. D. Salem, and T. Svana
The Khaviz Anticline: an outcrop analogue to giant fractured Asmari Formation reservoirs in SW Iran
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2007; 270(1): 23 - 42.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
G. H. Makel
The modelling of fractured reservoirs: constraints and potential for fracture network geometry and hydraulics analysis
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2007; 292(1): 375 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London