Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Petroleum Geoscience   Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Petroleum Geoscience; November 2007; v. 13; no. 4; p. 291-303; DOI: 10.1144/1354-079306-732
© 2007 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Worthington, P. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Original Article

A road map for improving the technical basis for the estimation of petroleum reserves

Paul F. Worthington

Gaffney, Cline & Associates, Bentley Hall, Blacknest, Alton, Hants. GU34 4PU, UK(pworthington{at}gaffney-cline.com)

Reserves estimation can be based on one or more methodologies, each with its associated uncertainty. These include ‘static’ volumetrics, reservoir simulation, material-balance analysis, and/or projections of ultimate recovery according to production decline. The static volumetric method is in focus here, as the most commonly used approach during the development and early production stages when there has been limited petroleum recovery and the uncertainty associated with a reserves estimate can be considerable. There are several key technical aspects of the static volumetric process, including: the issue of minimum data requirements in relation to reservoir complexity; the upscaling of reservoir parameters and the interpretative algorithms through which they are interrelated; the identification of net reservoir and net pay; and the integration of data sources in a manner that is dynamically conditioned, i.e. tied back to permeation properties. This last point is especially important because reserves, by definition, are commercially recoverable. Suggested improvements reveal additional opportunities for cross-validation and groundtruthing. The approach is synthesized into a high-level, yet pragmatic workplan. It is proposed that the adoption of such a workplan will remove some of the uncertainty that is currently inherent in the technical process for estimating reserves.

KEYWORDS: petroleum reserves, geoengineering workplan, data integration, uncertainty reduction







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London