Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Petroleum Geoscience   Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Petroleum Geoscience; May 2008; v. 14; no. 2; p. 139-150; DOI: 10.1144/1354-079308-739
© 2008 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wennberg, O. P.
Right arrow Articles by Knipe, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Original Article

On the occurrence and formation of open fractures in the Jurassic reservoir sandstones of the Snøhvit Field, SW Barents Sea

Ole Petter Wennberg1, Ove Malm1, Tim Needham2, Ewart Edwards2,3, Signe Ottesen1, Frode Karlsen4, Lars Rennan5 and Rob Knipe2

1 StatoilHydro ASA, 4035 Stavanger, Norway (oberg{at}statoilhydro.com)
2 Rock Deformation Research Ltd, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
3 Present address: Zadco, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
4 StatoilHydro ASA, Mølnholtet 42, N-9481 Harstad, Norway
5 StatoilHydro ASA, Rotvoll, Trondheim, Norway

Open fractures were described in core and Formation Micro Image (FMI) image logs in the Jurassic sandstones of the Tubåen, Nordmela and Stø formations in the Snøhvit Field, and 3D fracture network properties analysed using Computer Tomography (CT)scanning in selected core samples. The most frequent open fracture type is short stylolite-related fractures (F1), but longer open fractures are also present, with no obvious relationship to stylolites (F2). The F1 fracture densities are related generally to the clay content of the host rock, which controls the occurrence and spacing of the stylolites. The fractures are steep, with a N–S-dominant strike azimuth and significant spread. Although, generally, the F1 fractures are short, a percolating and 3D connected open fracture network across the core was found in most of the CT-scan samples. Open fractures were also found in the damage zone of a lately reactivated fault. The formation of the open fractures in the Snøhvit Field is related most likely to thermoelastic processes during removal of overburden in late Tertiary time. The presence of open fractures may influence reservoir flow, particularly in intervals containing a high frequency of stylolites and in the damage zones of reactivated faults.

KEYWORDS: open fractures, stylolites, sandstone reservoir, Snøhvit Field, Barents Sea




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Petroleum GeoscienceHome page
S. N. Ehrenberg, A. A. M. Aqrawi, and P. H. Nadeau
An overview of reservoir quality in producing Cretaceous strata of the Middle East
Petroleum Geoscience, November 1, 2008; 14(4): 307 - 318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London