Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Petroleum Geoscience   Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Petroleum Geoscience; May 2008; v. 14; no. 2; p. 183-196; DOI: 10.1144/1354-079308-719
© 2008 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ebadi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Corbett, P. W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Original Article

Evaluation of added value in reservoir management by application of flow control with intelligent wells

F. Ebadi, D. R. Davies, A. R. Gardiner and P. W. M. Corbett

Institute of Petroleum Engineering, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK(David.Davies{at}pet.hw.ac.uk)

Intelligent Well-systems Technology (IWsT) provides the delivery and management of production flexibility thorough downhole measurement and control. This paper uses a new workflow to evaluate the suitability of a wide range of reservoir types for IWsT application. This is achieved by a systematic study of a series of generic reservoir scenarios, based on property distributions derived from real field data and operational oil-field models. These geological scenarios were tested to determine the ‘Added Value’ from IWsT compared with standard well completions. Added value is expected through incremental oil recovery.

Results show that IWsT can control uneven, invading fluid fronts, which develop along the wellbore length due to permeability differences, reservoir compartmentalization, or different strengths of aquifer or gas cap support. The degree of improvement depends on the reservoir type (whether layered, faulted, channelized, etc.) and the distribution of porosity and permeability within it. Guidelines for the optimum placement of Internal Control Valve (ICV) locations in the planned completion zone are discussed. A global methodology was developed for the initial screening of favourable geological scenarios for the implementation of IWsT, and an ‘Application Envelope’ was developed based on the formation's correlation length and variability. The validity of this envelope is illustrated by its application to a real reservoir modelling case.

KEYWORDS: intelligent wells, reservoir type, uneven fluid fronts, reservoir heterogeneity, production optimization







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London