Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Petroleum Geoscience   Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Petroleum Geoscience; August 2008; v. 14; no. 3; p. 263-271; DOI: 10.1144/1354-079308-771
© 2008 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teles, V.
Right arrow Articles by Arnaud-Vanneau, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Original Article

Carbonate production and stratigraphic architecture of shelf-margin wedges (Cretaceous, Vercors): lessons from a stratigraphic modelling approach

Vanessa Teles1, Rémi Eschard1, Gisèle Etienne1, Simon Lopez1 and Annie Arnaud-Vanneau2

1 Institut Français du Pétrole, 1 & 4 avenue de Bois Préau, BP 311, 92506 Rueil Malmaison cedex, France(Vanessa.TELES{at}ifp.fr)
2 Laboratoire de Géodynamique des chaînes Alpines, Maison des Géosciences, 38041 Grenoble cedex, France

This work was presented at the EAGE workshop in Grenoble. Its purpose was to illustrate a stratigraphic modelling approach on a single schematic 2D case and to discuss which sedimentary features are imaged on synthetic seismic sections at different frequencies. The Vercors plateau carbonate sequence, deposited during the Barremian to Early Aptian, was considered. Modelling hypotheses constrained mainly the depositional time length and the geometry of each sequence. In addition, it was assumed that most of the carbonates were produced in situ.

The stratigraphic modelling approach and lessons from the simulation results are presented, followed by a discussion of how stratigraphic modelling can be a helpful tool to validate or question the geological model. In order to reproduce the sequence geometries, rates of carbonate production needed to be changed between regressive and transgressive periods. Simulated sea-level changes do not match the geological estimations from field interpretation but they are in agreement with the magnitude of sea-level curve variations, with the exception of the early Barremian sequences. Qualitative and quantitative results from the model simulations help to question or validate the geological model. Stratigraphic modelling provides some insight into the way the carbonate system may have worked.

Secondly, for a smaller 2D geological model, several synthetic seismic sections were computed using wavelets of different dominant frequencies. The seismic sections are compared to underline what is imaged mainly at the different frequencies. The presence of two characteristic facies were also analysed. Results show the importance of some thin beds inside thick sequences and that certain sequence boundaries may not be visible at all.

KEYWORDS: stratigraphic modelling, carbonate production, cretaceous, synthetic seismic, Vercors




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Petroleum GeoscienceHome page
H. Ligtenberg and F. Neves
Integrating disciplines for petroleum system analysis - from seismic interpretation to stratigraphic and basin modelling
Petroleum Geoscience, August 1, 2008; 14(3): 219 - 221.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London