Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Petroleum Geoscience   Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Petroleum Geoscience; August 2008; v. 14; no. 3; p. 281-289; DOI: 10.1144/1354-079308-767
© 2008 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sylta, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Original Article

Analysing exploration uncertainties by tight integration of seismic and hydrocarbon migration modelling

Øyvind Sylta

Migris AS, PO Box 1273 Pir-senteret, 7462 Trondheim, Norway (Oyvind.sylta{at}migris.no)

High success rates in the exploration for oil and gas can be achieved by incorporating best practice strategies in estimating the geological uncertainties from seismic data and geological models. A tight coupling of the seismic information and hydrocarbon migration modelling may allow for a consistent handling of uncertainties throughout the analysis. Seismic uncertainties include velocities used for depth conversion, the positioning of structural interpretations including faults, and assigning flow properties from seismic attributes. The necessary output from the seismic uncertainty analysis could be provided as uncertainty fields that may be used as input to hydrocarbon migration modelling.

The nonlinearity of the hydrocarbon migration process, including flow-path selection and trap phase filtering, frequently requires that local uncertainties are addressed in more detail. These uncertainties may require high-resolution seismic analyses in order to be further resolved. The structural interpretation is of particular importance to accumulation uncertainties, and fault juxtaposition and carrier dip direction uncertainty estimations can improve phase prediction estimates in exploration prospects. It is suggested that an improved best practice for exploration for oil and gas should include a tight coupling of the handling of uncertainties from seismic data in hydrocarbon migration modelling.

KEYWORDS: structural interpretations, seismic information, petroleum migration modelling, uncertainties, best practice, workflow




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Petroleum GeoscienceHome page
H. Ligtenberg and F. Neves
Integrating disciplines for petroleum system analysis - from seismic interpretation to stratigraphic and basin modelling
Petroleum Geoscience, August 1, 2008; 14(3): 219 - 221.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London