Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Petroleum Geoscience   Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Petroleum Geoscience; 1 November 2008; v. 14; no. 4; p. 399-409; DOI: 10.1144/1354-079308-718
© 2008 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pettersen, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Using relations between stress and fluid pressure for improved compaction modelling in flow simulation and increased efficiency in coupled rock mechanics simulation

Øystein Pettersen

Centre for Integrated Petroleum Research PO Box 7800, NO-5020 Bergen, Norway

The conventional compaction model used in reservoir simulators defines compaction as a function of fluid pressure, whereas, in reality, it is a function of effective stress. The interrelationship between fluid pressure, effective stress and reservoir parameters (materials distribution, geometry, production scheme) is investigated. By modifying the conventional concept of flow simulator compaction a predictor is constructed for the rock mechanics computations in a coupled flow–rock mechanics simulation. This predictor reduces the time to converge the stress computations by reducing or eliminating the number of pore volume iterations in the coupling scheme. Overall computing time is thereby reduced considerably, while maintaining accuracy in the stress computations. Additionally, the compaction state in the flow simulator will be more accurate than in a conventional iterative coupling scheme.

KEYWORDS: compaction, reservoir simulation, rock mechanics, coupled simulation, effective stress







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London