Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Petroleum Geoscience   Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Petroleum Geoscience; 1 November 2009; v. 15; no. 4; p. 345-354; DOI: 10.1144/1354-079309-819
© 2009 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Jager, G.
Right arrow Articles by Luthi, S. M.

Article

An evaluation of relevant geological parameters for predicting the flow behaviour of channelized reservoirs

Gerben de Jager1,*, Jorn F. M. Van Doren2, Jan Dirk Jansen1 and Stefan M. Luthi1

1 Department of Geotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN, Delft, The Netherlands
2 Delft Centre for Systems and Control, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands

* Corresponding author (e-mail: g.dejager{at}tudelft.nl)

We evaluated the relationship between geological parameters and the flow behaviour of channelized reservoirs with the aid of an experimental design approach. The geological parameters included geometrical properties, such as channel dimensions and sinuosity, petrophysical parameters, such as permeability and net-to-gross ratio, and a derived property: connectivity. The reservoir flow behaviour was characterized with various metrics based on simulated production data generated with the aid of reservoir flow simulations. In the first part of our study, we found a weak correlation between the geometrical parameters and the reservoir flow behaviour, whereas we found a strong correlation between connectivity and the flow behaviour. In the second part we demonstrate how to use the strong correlation between connectivity and flow behaviour to make a selection of models with similar production response from a large ensemble of reservoir model realizations.

KEYWORDS: fluvial reservoirs, recovery estimates, uncertainty, model selection, reservoir modelling







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London