Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Petroleum Geoscience   Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Petroleum Geoscience; March 2001; v. 7; no. 1; p. 3-12
© 2001 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Megson, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hardman, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Articles

Exploration for and development of hydrocarbons in the Chalk of the North Sea: a low permeability system

Joan Megson1 and Richard Hardman2

1 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cardiff, and consultant, Gwynedd Oil and Gas, Meifod Isa, Dyffryn Ardudwy, Gwynedd LL44 2DS, UK (e-mail:joanmegson{at}email.msn.com)
2 Amerada Hess International Ltd, 33 Grosvenor Place, London SW1X 7HY, UK (e-mail:richard.hardman{at}hess.com)

It is evident that all or most North Sea Chalk fields have dipping oil–water contacts and that some also have dipping free water levels. Furthermore, there are Chalk fields, such as South Arne (Denmark) and Joanne (UK) with steeply dipping oil–water contacts and a large element of non-structural trapping, while other discoveries, such as the recent Halfdan discovery northwest of the Danish Dan Field, have no element of structural trapping and appear to lie on a Tertiary migration pathway. It is also evident that the presence of North Sea Chalk oil, both as fields and shows, is localized and, generally, confined to areas of early source maturation – although there are exceptions, such as the UK Fife and Flora Chalk oil accumulations, which are distant from a source basin.

We believe that these attributes reflect the same cause, that is the very low lateral and vertical permeability (typically 0.1 to 1 mD air permeability) of the Chalk system. Our hypothesis is that oil enters the Chalk from the Jurassic at a limited number of entry points within the early mature basin and, only if the oil reaches Chalk of relatively high permeabilities, normally the Tor Formation, does the oil migrate significant distances laterally. This oil migration occurs at geological timescales, i.e. kilometres over millions of years and we, therefore, have to consider the configuration of the Chalk – with respect to migration routes and traps – at the time the oil was injected into the Chalk and began to migrate through it, which was normally prior to the North Sea Miocene inversion and later tilting. There is considerable evidence for trapping in Chalk palaeostructural traps; oil migrated into a palaeohigh, segregated vertically and is trapped by the low oil relative permeabilities within the transition zone when the trap later tilts. Another trapping mechanism is the migration trap, as described for the Halfdan discovery in Denmark, where, in an area mature for Chalk exploration, oil has been discovered in continuity with the Dan Field but with a free water level 700 ft lower. This type of trap may contain significant reserves of oil in chalks of 1 mD permeability and, in recent years, it has become possible to exploit chalks of this nature commercially. It is also possible to develop these chalks when no effective natural fracture system exists.

KEYWORDS: Chalk, permeability, exploration, North Sea




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Petroleum GeoscienceHome page
I. L. Fabricius, B. Rogen, and L. Gommesen
How depositional texture and diagenesis control petrophysical and elastic properties of samples from five North Sea chalk fields
Petroleum Geoscience, February 1, 2007; 13(1): 81 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Petroleum GeoscienceHome page
L. Klinkby, L. Kristensen, E. B. Nielsen, K. Zinck-Jorgensen, and L. Stemmerik
Mapping and characterization of thin chalk reservoirs using data integration: the Kraka Field, Danish North Sea
Petroleum Geoscience, May 1, 2005; 11(2): 113 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Petroleum Geology Conference seriesHome page
J. W. MUNNS, J. C. GRAY, S. J. STOKER, I. J. ANDREWS, and T. D. J. CAMERON
The remaining hydrocarbon potential of the UK Continental Shelf
Geological Society, London, Petroleum Geology Conference series, January 1, 2005; 6(0): 41 - 54.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Petroleum Geology Conference seriesHome page
M. HEMMET
The hydrocarbon potential of the Danish Continental Shelf
Geological Society, London, Petroleum Geology Conference series, January 1, 2005; 6(0): 85 - 97.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Petroleum Geology Conference seriesHome page
J. MEGSON and T. TYGESEN
The North Sea Chalk: an underexplored and underdeveloped play
Geological Society, London, Petroleum Geology Conference series, January 1, 2005; 6(0): 159 - 168.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Petroleum Geology Conference seriesHome page
F. JAKOBSEN, J. R. INESON, L. KRISTENSEN, H. P. NYTOFT, and L. STEMMERIK
The Valdemar Field, Danish Central Graben: field compartmentalization and regional prospectivity of the Lower Cretaceous chalk play
Geological Society, London, Petroleum Geology Conference series, January 1, 2005; 6(0): 177 - 186.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Petroleum Geology Conference seriesHome page
O. V. VEJBAeK, P. FRYKMAN, N. BECH, and C. M. NIELSEN
The history of hydrocarbon filling of Danish chalk fields
Geological Society, London, Petroleum Geology Conference series, January 1, 2005; 6(0): 1331 - 1345.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Petroleum GeoscienceHome page
O. V. Vejbaek
Reservoir characterization of the Roar Gas Field, Danish North Sea
Petroleum Geoscience, March 1, 2002; 8(1): 71 - 87.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London