Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Petroleum Geoscience   Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Petroleum Geoscience; June 2001; v. 7; no. 2; p. 131-136
© 2001 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grattoni, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dawe, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Articles

Production of gas from waterflood residual oil: gas saturation build-up and relative permeabilities

C. A. Grattoni1, R. I. Hawes1 and R. A. Dawe2

1 Centre for Petroleum Studies, TH Huxley School, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, UK
2 Petroleum Engineering Unit, Chemical Engineering Department, University of West Indies, St Augustine, Trinidad

When solution gas is released from waterflooded residual oil by depressurization, the gas becomes mobilized after the critical gas saturation has been reached, but the gas saturation continues to increase as more gas is generated. The rate of gas saturation change plus the unrecoverable gas (gas saturation remaining at the end of the depressurization) are important in determining the economic performance of the process. The values depend upon the rate of gas generation and the gas relative permeability.

Experiments are reported to measure water and gas relative permeabilities when gas is released from waterflooded residual oil. The values for the gas phase were extremely low, approximately an order of magnitude lower than would be predicted using a Corey-type equation suggesting that gas relative permeabilities measured in normal gas–water displacement experiments are not applicable to the depressurization of waterflooded reservoirs.

The low values of gas relative permeabilities can be explained by the fact that the filaments which form the channels for gas flow are not stable, and that the flow is intermittent. Visual observations of the flow behaviour in micromodels have confirmed this. As a result, the effective total area for flow at any particular gas saturation is substantially reduced, thus reducing the permeability to the gas. New algorithms need to be introduced into the network models for estimating relative permeabilities in these situations before they can be used to represent the cyclical nature of filament rupture and reformation.

KEYWORDS: residual oil, pressure release, dissolved gas, gas saturation, relative permeability







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London