Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Petroleum Geoscience   Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Petroleum Geoscience; June 2001; v. 7; no. 2; p. 163-172
© 2001 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stephen, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Gardiner, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Articles

Outcrop-based stochastic modelling of turbidite amalgamation and its effects on hydrocarbon recovery

Karl D. Stephen, Julian D. Clark and Andy R. Gardiner

Department of Petroleum Engineering, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK

In sandstone-dominated successions of sheet-like turbidites, erosion of thin shale horizons during deposition of the overlying turbidite may lead locally to vertical amalgamation of sandstone beds, resulting in discontinuous thin fine-grained beds or, in the extreme case, thoroughly amalgamated sandstone. Measurements of discontinuous shale lengths from very well exposed turbidite successions have enabled the development of a mixed rule-based/stochastic model for the erosion of shales. Monte Carlo realizations of 2D cross-sections were used to examine the effects of shale discontinuities on both single-and two-phase flow, at the genetic sedimentary unit scale. Results demonstrate that the flow is strongly dependent on the balance of viscous, capillary and gravity forces, which can vary according to the distribution of amalgamation surfaces. The single-phase upscaled ratio of horizontal to vertical permeability and the fraction of mobile oil recovered can be related to the fraction of shale removed (amalgamation ratio) by log-linear and linear relationships respectively.

KEYWORDS: turbidites, outcrop, simulation, two-phase flow




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
R. P. Sech, M. D. Jackson, and G. J. Hampson
Three-dimensional modeling of a shoreface-shelf parasequence reservoir analog: Part 1. Surface-based modeling to capture high-resolution facies architecture
AAPG Bulletin, September 1, 2009; 93(9): 1155 - 1181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
J. Howell, A. Vassel, and T. Aune
Modelling of dipping clinoform barriers within deltaic outcrop analogues from the Cretaceous Western Interior Basin, USA
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2008; 309(1): 99 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
P. Freeman, S. Kelly, C. Macdonald, J. Millington, and M. Tothill
The Schiehallion Field: lessons learned modelling a complex deepwater turbidite
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2008; 309(1): 205 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London