Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Petroleum Geoscience   Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Petroleum Geoscience; September 2001; v. 7; no. 3; p. 321-330
© 2001 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, R.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, H. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Articles

Characterization of heterolithic deposits using electrofacies analysis in the tide-dominated Lower Jurassic Cook Formation (Gullfaks Field, offshore Norway)

Renu Gupta1,2 and Howard D. Johnson2

1 T. H. Huxley School of Environment, Earth Sciences and Engineering, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2 BP, UK
2 Present address: Schlumberger H-RT, Schlumberger House, Buckingham Gate, Gatwick Airport, West Sussex, RH6 0NZ, UK

A range of heterolithic facies, comprising thinly interbedded (millimetre–decimetre scale) sandstones and mudstones, characterizes the heterogeneous Lower Jurassic Cook Formation, including the productive Cook-3 reservoir in the Gullfaks Field. These heterolithic facies were deposited in a tide-dominated estuarine to deltaic setting and show up as massive ‘shaly-sands’ on conventional wireline logs. This makes the recognition and discrimination of different heterolithic facies types virtually impossible, which severely limits detailed reservoir geological and petrophysical predictions. This problem has been addressed by undertaking a high resolution electrofacies analysis using core facies as a ‘training set’ and applying this, through multivariate statistical techniques, to the interpretation of the conventional logs.

An electrofacies database was created comprising five genetically linked rock types (ranging from lenticular-wavy bedding, through flaser bedding and into clean/massive sandstones). This electrofacies scheme was validated with reference to c. 125 m of cored section from five wells using gamma-ray, density and neutron logs. Multivariate statistical techniques have enabled probabilistic discrimination of the different types of heterolithic facies down to intervals of only 0.25 to 0.5 m thick, which is considerably greater than could be achieved using conventional well-log evaluation techniques alone.

KEYWORDS: heterogenous reservoir, tidal flat, sandstone reservoir, core analysis, well log interpretation, reservoir characterization




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Petroleum GeoscienceHome page
A. W. Martinius, P. S. Ringrose, C. Brostrom, C. Elfenbein, A. Naess, and J. E. Ringas
Reservoir challenges of heterolithic tidal sandstone reservoirs in the Halten Terrace, mid-Norway
Petroleum Geoscience, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 3 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London