Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Petroleum Geoscience   Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Petroleum Geoscience; June 2002; v. 8; no. 2; p. 119-132
© 2002 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manzocchi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Childs, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Articles

The representation of two phase fault-rock properties in flow simulation models

T. Manzocchi1, A.E. Heath2, J.J. Walsh1 and C. Childs1

1 Fault Analysis Group, Department of Geology, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland (e-mail:fault{at}fag.ucd.ie)
2 Fault Analysis Group, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK

Faults are represented conventionally in production flow simulation models using transmissibility multipliers which capture the single phase, but not the two phase, fault-rock properties. Available data indicate that fault-rocks have similar two phase properties to sediments of the same permeability, hence existing methods can be applied to estimate two phase fault-rock properties from their intrinsic permeabilities. Two methods of representing the two phase fault-rock properties implicitly in the flow simulator are compared, using one-dimensional numerical flow models containing water-wet faults with imbibition capillary pressure curves. The method which is the closer two phase analogue of the single phase transmissibility multiplier is inappropriate, as the implementation is unreasonably unwieldy. A simpler implementation is to derive pseudo-relative permeability functions including the fault-rock properties in the upstream grid block; these properties are then incorporated directly in the simulator. Relative transmissibility multiplier functions can be back-calculated from the pseudo-relative permeability functions, and indicate how closely the single phase multiplier approximates two phase flow through the fault. Implementation in a 3D model with complex fault juxtapositions validates the approach, and a practical workflow for the routine inclusion of two phase fault-rock properties in conventional faulted flow simulation models is outlined.

KEYWORDS: fault (geology), relative permeability, capillary pressure, flow model




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Petroleum GeoscienceHome page
T. Manzocchi, J. N. Carter, A. Skorstad, B. Fjellvoll, K. D. Stephen, J. A. Howell, J. D. Matthews, J. J. Walsh, M. Nepveu, C. Bos, et al.
Sensitivity of the impact of geological uncertainty on production from faulted and unfaulted shallow-marine oil reservoirs: objectives and methods
Petroleum Geoscience, February 1, 2008; 14(1): 3 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Petroleum GeoscienceHome page
T. Manzocchi, A. E. Heath, B. Palananthakumar, C. Childs, and J. J. Walsh
Faults in conventional flow simulation models: a consideration of representational assumptions and geological uncertainties
Petroleum Geoscience, February 1, 2008; 14(1): 91 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
S. R. Freeman, S. D. Harris, and R. J. Knipe
Fault seal mapping - incorporating geometric and property uncertainty
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2008; 309(1): 5 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
P. S. Ringrose, A. W. Martinius, and J. Alvestad
Multiscale geological reservoir modelling in practice
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2008; 309(1): 123 - 134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Petroleum GeoscienceHome page
N. Fredman, J. Tveranger, S. Semshaug, A. Braathen, and E. Sverdrup
Sensitivity of fluid flow to fault core architecture and petrophysical properties of fault rocks in siliciclastic reservoirs: a synthetic fault model study
Petroleum Geoscience, November 1, 2007; 13(4): 305 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Petroleum GeoscienceHome page
S. J. Jolley, H. Dijk, J. H. Lamens, Q. J. Fisher, T. Manzocchi, H. Eikmans, and Y. Huang
Faulting and fault sealing in production simulation models: Brent Province, northern North Sea
Petroleum Geoscience, November 1, 2007; 13(4): 321 - 340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Petroleum GeoscienceHome page
S. S. Berg and E. Oian
Hierarchical approach for simulating fluid flow in normal fault zones
Petroleum Geoscience, February 1, 2007; 13(1): 25 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Petroleum GeoscienceHome page
E. A. Flodin, L. J. Durlofsky, and A. Aydin
Upscaled models of flow and transport in faulted sandstone: boundary condition effects and explicit fracture modelling
Petroleum Geoscience, April 1, 2004; 10(2): 173 - 181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Petroleum GeoscienceHome page
W. R. Bailey, T. Manzocchi, J. J. Walsh, K. Keogh, D. Hodgetts, J. Rippon, P. A. R. Nell, S. Flint, and J. A. Strand
The effect of faults on the 3D connectivity of reservoir bodies: a case study from the East Pennine Coalfield, UK
Petroleum Geoscience, September 1, 2002; 8(3): 263 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London