Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Petroleum Geoscience   Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Petroleum Geoscience; September 2002; v. 8; no. 3; p. 209-216
© 2002 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morton, K.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Articles

Detailed analysis of probe permeameter and interval pressure transient test permeability measurements in a heterogeneous reservoir

Kirsty Morton1, Simon Thomas2, Patrick Corbett1 and David Davies1

1 Institute of Petroleum Engineering, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK (e-mail:kirsty.morton{at}pet.hw.ac.uk)
2 BP, Godesetdalen 8, PO Box 197, 4065 Stavanger, Norway

The goal of reservoir characterization is to generate models that allow the accurate prediction of future well performance and the estimation of reserves. Of particular importance to the characterization of permeability heterogeneity is an accurate understanding of vertical flow behaviour in a reservoir. Upscaling techniques applied to conventional core plug and probe permeameter permeability anisotropy are compared with Interval Pressure Transient Tests (IPTT) conducted with multiprobe formation testers. The aim is to investigate the scale of the dynamic permeability measurement and review the representivity of the IPTT estimate in a field example. We illustrate improvement in permeability anisotropy estimation by a combination of dynamic measurements with static measurements.

Further to this, we consider the permeability prediction from continuous downhole measurement. High-resolution measurements such as probe permeametry data and borehole imaging can produce the most complete data coverage at the well and have similar measurement scales. Predicted permeabilities are compared with IPTT results by upscaling to a length scale appropriate to the IPTT and the geometry of the formation.

KEYWORDS: formation tester, heterogeneous reservoir, permeability (rock), reservoir characteristic




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Petroleum Geology Conference seriesHome page
C. ELFENBEIN, O. HUSBY, and P. RINGROSE
Geologically based estimation of kv/kh ratios: an example from the Garn Formation, Tyrihans Field, Mid-Norway
Geological Society, London, Petroleum Geology Conference series, January 1, 2005; 6(0): 537 - 543.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Petroleum GeoscienceHome page
P. Ringrose, K. Nordahl, and R. Wen
Vertical permeability estimation in heterolithic tidal deltaic sandstones
Petroleum Geoscience, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 29 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London