|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| Petroleum Geoscience |
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Articles |
1 Fault Analysis Group, Department of Geology, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland (e-mail:fault{at}fag.ucd.ie)
2 Stratigraphy Group, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
3 International Mining Consultants, PO Box 18, Mill Lane, Huthwaite, Sutton In Ashfield, Nottinghamshire NG17 2NS, UK
4 Present address: Badley Earth Sciences, North Beck House, Hundleby, Spilsby, Lincolnshire PE23 5NB, UK
5 Present address: Statoil ASA, D308, Forushagen, Grenseveien 21, N-4035 Stavenger, Norway
The connectivity of reservoir bodies has been tested in unfaulted and variably faulted, high resolution 3D geocellular stratigraphic models (16 million cells in a 20 km x 20 km x c. 600 m volume) from the East Pennine Coalfield, UK. These deterministic stratigraphic–structural models are underpinned by high density borehole and mineplan data. The stratigraphy extends from mid-Westphalian A to base Westphalian C and represents a low net:gross (0.03–0.27) coal-bearing, delta top/fluvial reservoir analogue. The models contain up to 1467 post-depositional normal faults with maximum displacements ranging from 1 m to 140 m. Using two sets of facies as net, the effect of fault size on inferred reservoir connectivity has been assessed for stratal intervals with different sedimentary architecture, interval net:gross and thickness.
Faults often disconnect reservoirs in thinner, lower net:gross intervals containing only laterally discontinuous, channelized bodies. By contrast, faults generally increase reservoir connectivity in thick, relatively high net:gross intervals containing laterally extensive, tabular reservoir bodies. The most significant factor for fault-related reservoir connectivity is the dimensionality and scale of reservoir bodies in relation to the displacement distribution along faults. Populations of small, sub-seismic, faults (<5 m throw) can reconnect reservoir bodies that are dissected by larger displacement, seismic resolvable, faults (>20 m throw).
KEYWORDS: fault (geology), reservoir model, reservoir characteristic
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Manzocchi, J. D. Matthews, J. A. Strand, J. N. Carter, A. Skorstad, J. A. Howell, K. D. Stephen, and J. J. Walsh A study of the structural controls on oil recovery from shallow-marine reservoirs Petroleum Geoscience, February 1, 2008; 14(1): 55 - 70. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. E. d. Medeiros, A. F. d. Nascimento, A. F. Antunes, E. F. Jardim de Sa, and F. F. Lima Neto Spatial pressure compartmentalization in faulted reservoirs as a consequence of fault connectivity: a fluid flow modelling perspective, Xareu oil field, NE Brazil Petroleum Geoscience, November 1, 2007; 13(4): 341 - 352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Ainsworth Sequence stratigraphic-based analysis of reservoir connectivity: influence of sealing faults - a case study from a marginal marine depositional setting Petroleum Geoscience, May 1, 2006; 12(2): 127 - 141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Ainsworth Sequence stratigraphic-based analysis of reservoir connectivity: influence of depositional architecture - a case study from a marginal marine depositional setting Petroleum Geoscience, August 1, 2005; 11(3): 257 - 276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |