Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Petroleum Geoscience   Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Petroleum Geoscience; April 2003; v. 9; no. 2; p. 163-174; DOI: 10.1144/1354-079302-498
© 2003 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kovscek, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Original Article

Integrating production history into reservoir models using streamline-based time-of-flight ranking

Y. Wang and A. R. Kovscek

Department of Petroleum Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2220, USA(e-mail: kovscek@pangea.stanford.edu)

The reservoir models generated by geostatistical techniques, but unconstrained to production history, provide equally probable reservoir descriptions that honour observed geology. However, flow simulation results on these models may vary widely where there is geological uncertainty. Constraining geostatistical models to known production history reduces this uncertainty. To this end, a streamline-based algorithm is proposed for ranking geostatistical realizations with regard to production history. First, a rapid, streamline-based inversion method is applied to obtain a history-matched reservoir model. Then the streamline geometries and properties, such as the time-of-flight, are computed without full flow simulation for the history-matched model and the geostatistical models examined. Each model is compared to the history-matched model with regard to streamline properties. In this way, reservoir models that match production history and honour known geological information are obtained. Synthetic examples using up to 600 distinct reservoir models demonstrate computational efficiency and also show that the method readily selects the most appropriate permeability fields. Flow simulations confirm that the selected permeability fields are satisfactory. The technique also appears to be appropriate for downscaling history-matched reservoir models from coarse to fine grids.

KEYWORDS: history matching, streamlines, data integration, inverse modelling







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London