Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Petroleum Geoscience   Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Petroleum Geoscience; July 2003; v. 9; no. 3; p. 243-254; DOI: 10.1144/1354-079302-563
© 2003 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sylta, O.
Right arrow Articles by Krokstad, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Original Article

Estimation of oil and gas column heights in prospects using probabilistic basin modelling methods

Øyvind Sylta1 and Wenche Krokstad2

1 SINTEF Petroleum Research, Trondheim, N-7465, Norway (e-mail: oyvind.sylta@iku.sintef.no)
2 Konsul Lorcks gt. 21, N-7044 Trondheim Norway

Source rock and reservoir rock properties are often poorly constrained in the exploration for oil and gas. Geological analogues may be used to create source rock and reservoir rock models in areas with only sparse well data coverage. Exploration risks are often influenced by uncertainties in the rock facies models. This paper outlines a methodology for assessing the consequences of using two or more source and reservoir models on hydrocarbon phase distributions in prospects.

Each source rock and reservoir rock scenario is represented by computerized maps (grids) of thickness, porosities and other properties. The uncertainties of each scenario are described using probabilistic properties. The reservoir thickness may be represented by a uniform distribution with the mean described using a map (grid) with a standard deviation of, for example, 50 m. A Monte Carlo simulation is carried out for this part of the petroleum system and the resulting probabilities of oil and gas in prospects are compiled by weighting each run to calibration wells. The results can be plotted as a map of most likely oil and gas column heights. An uncertainty map is also plotted. The results can be used to rank drilling locations with respect to large oil columns and low uncertainties. The oil and gas column probabilities can be estimated for each well location.

As (more) wells are drilled within a petroleum system the best match simulations can be used to further refine predictions as well as to create an updated map of the petroleum system.

KEYWORDS: basin modelling, Monte Carlo, simulation, probabilistic, migration modelling




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Petroleum GeoscienceHome page
O. Sylta
Analysing exploration uncertainties by tight integration of seismic and hydrocarbon migration modelling
Petroleum Geoscience, August 1, 2008; 14(3): 281 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Petroleum GeoscienceHome page
O. Sylta
A probabilistic approach to improved geological knowledge and reduced exploration risks using hydrocarbon migration modelling
Petroleum Geoscience, July 1, 2004; 10(3): 187 - 198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London